Gossip and Hidden Transcript in The Online and Offline Interaction: The Case of Closed Group Communication

Rudi Sukandar

doi:10.37535/101004120171

Authors

Rudi Sukandar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37535/101004120171

Keywords:

Gossip, Hidden Transcript, Goffman, Dramaturgy, Behaviour

Abstract

Despite having negative content, gossip and backstage talks can also be a medium to learn about differences and provide information for the rest of the community. Furthermore, backstage talks not only contain mere gossip, but also reflect the hidden transcripts by individuals who perceived themselves to be less powerful than the power holders. Given the phenomena, this paper attempted to investigate the online backstage talks between community members and their face-to-face interaction with the object of their gossips by using the concepts of Goffmanâ€™s dramaturgy, gossip, and hidden transcript. The study found that Goffmanâ€™s (1959) concept of performance, while useful, could not fully work in analyzing deviant behaviors. This study further confirms Wittek and Wielersâ€™ (1998) affirmation that coalition triads as the best predictors of gossip behavior. However, another triad model, called neutralization, is proposed to predict the occurrences of gossip. Finally, the study also confirms the existence of the hidden transcripts by community participants who felt being oppressed by the powers that be.

References

Alfano, M., & Robinson, B. (2017). Gossip as a burdened virtue. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 20(3), 473-487.

Bausmeister, R. F., & Zhang, L. (2004). Gossip as Cultural Learning. Review of General Psychology, 8 (2), 111-121.

Bertens, K. (2001). Filsafat barat kontemporer: Prancis (2nd vol.). [Contemporary western philosophy: France). Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Dreyfus, H. L., & Rabinow, P. (1983). Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (2nd edn.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Hambaugh, J. L. (2011). Gossipmongers: Interest in gossip as a function of gender and mode of transmission (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA

Hura, G. S. (1998). The internet: Global information superhighway for the future. Computer Communication, 20, 1412-1430.

Felsteiner, W. L. F., Abel, R. L., & Sarat, A. (1980-1981). The emergence and transformation of disputes: Naming, blaming, claiming. Law and Society Review, 15, 631-654).

Foster, E. K. (2004). Research on gossip: Taxonomy, methods, and future directions. Review of General Psychology, 8 (2), 78-99.

Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor Books.

Guendouzi, J. (2001). â€˜Youâ€™ll think weâ€™re always bitchingâ€™: The functions of cooperativity and competition in womenâ€™s gossip. Discourse Studies, 3 (1), 29-51.

Murphy, A G. (1998). Hidden transcripts of fight attendant resistance. Management Communicating Quarterly, 11, 499-535.

Scott, J. C. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. New haven: Yale University Press.

Warber, K. M. (2013). The role of interpersonal jealousy in gossip: An evolutionary perspective. Retrieved from http://www.msubillings.edu/CommFaculty/Coffman/410%20online/readings/gossip.pdf

Wert, S. R., & Salovey, P. (2004). A social comparison account of gossip. Review of General Psychology, 8 (2), 122-137.

Wittek, R., & Wielers, R. (1998). Gossip in organizations. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 4 (2), 189-204.